General practice funding underpins the persistence of the inverse care law: cross-sectional study in Scotland.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Universal access to health care, as provided in the NHS, does not ensure that patients' needs are met. AIM To explore the relationships between multimorbidity, general practice funding, and workload by deprivation in a national healthcare system. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study using routine data from 956 general practices in Scotland. METHOD Estimated numbers of patients with multimorbidity, estimated numbers of consultations per 1000 patients, and payments to practices per patient are presented and analysed by deprivation decile at practice level. RESULTS Levels of multimorbidity rose with practice deprivation. Practices in the most deprived decile had 38% more patients with multimorbidity compared with the least deprived (222.8 per 1000 patients versus 161.1; P<0.001) and over 120% more patients with combined mental-physical multimorbidity (113.0 per 1000 patients versus 51.5; P<0.001). Practices in the most deprived decile had 20% more consultations per annum compared with the least deprived (4616 versus 3846, P<0.001). There was no association between total practice funding and deprivation (Spearman ρ -0.09; P = 0.03). Although consultation rates increased with deprivation, the social gradients in multimorbidity were much steeper. There was no association between consultation rates and levels of funding. CONCLUSION No evidence was found that general practice funding matches clinical need, as estimated by different definitions of multimorbidity. Consultation rates provide only a partial estimate of the work involved in addressing clinical needs and are poorly related to the prevalence of multimorbidity. In these circumstances, general practice is unlikely to mitigate health inequalities and may increase them.
منابع مشابه
Morality and Values in Support of Universal Healthcare Must be Enshrined in Law; Comment on “Morality and Markets in the NHS”
This is a commentary on Gilbert and colleagues’ (1) paper on morality and markets in the National Health Service (NHS). Morality and values are not ephemeral qualities and universal healthcare is not simply an aspiration; it has to be enshrined in law. The creation of the UK NHS in 1948 was underpinned by core legal duties which required a system of public funding and delivery to follow. The mo...
متن کاملمیزان آگاهی و عملکرد در خصوص مراقبت از خود در بیماران دیابتی شهر کرمانشاه در سال 1393: یک گزارش کوتاه
Background and Objective: Diabetes is an important challenge to health. This study was performed in order to determine the knowledge and practice level of self-directed care among patients. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, demographic questionnaires, knowledge and practice questionnaire were completed by patients. Self-care status of patients was analyzed using t-...
متن کاملWho cares in England and Wales? The Positive Care Law: cross-sectional study.
BACKGROUND The inverse care law proposing that medical services are distributed inversely to population health needs, and that this law operates more completely where medical care is most exposed to market forces, was first suggested by Tudor Hart in 1971. This paper considers whether an inverse care law can be observed for the provision of informal care as well as for medical care. AIM Using...
متن کاملAuthor's response to reviews Title: Patient enablement requires physician empathy: a cross-sectional study of general practice consultations in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation in Scotland Authors:
متن کامل
Association between practice size and quality of care of patients with ischaemic heart disease: cross sectional study.
Muthoni for conducting the interviews in Kenya and Allison Worth and Judith Brown for reviewing data analysis in Scotland and Kenya, respectively. We thank Kirsty Boyd and Derek Doyle for commenting on drafts of this paper and Arthur Andere, James Mwenda, and Jane Njeru, members of the advisory group which provided support in Kenya. Contributors: See bmj.com Funding: These studies were funded i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
دوره 65 641 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015